In the critical five-day spell which determined England's
World Cup fate, Rooney manned up to lead his nation to Rio next June, but it
was Andros Townsend and Leighton Baines who stole the headlines. Apparently,
new faces got the nation excited, when the golden generation is yet to live up
to the expectation.
One man is again lost in translation. He seldom steals the
show but is always a consistent contributor on the field. Michael Carrick's
presence in the second half against Montenegro and the 70 minutes against
Poland made a significant difference to the England side, which have long been
passively predictable in big occasions.
Looking to repeat his European triumph, Sir Alex Ferguson
quickly identified Carrick as one of his missing puzzles. His ability to play
the ball out of defence, spread the ball around the field and enhance the
quality of possession has made him indispensable in United’s midfield last few
years.
Carrick (left) is often surrounded by starpower |
Joining United brought Carrick's career to another level,
but may have also hurt his international career. Though being pivotal to United’s
success, his low-profile playing style is further overshadowed by the stars at
Old Trafford. Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo, Robin van Persie and co. have
always attracted the attention. Even in 2008 when they came on top in the Champions
League, Paul Scholes, Ryan Giggs and even Owen Hargreaves were recognised ahead
of Carrick.
One reason he did not win over the heart of the fans is that
he is no typical English midfielder. There are no all-out tackles or tireless runs
in his game; instead, it is his well-thought anticipation and composure is only
seen as slow and indecisive in the fast and furious England soil. He simply
doesn’t fit the 4-4-2 formation many English managers – especially the one in
charge now – favour. He is often behind the hardworking and marauding
counterparts.
always play with composure |
This is why Owen Hargreaves, Gareth Barry and most recently Jack
Wilshere are all higher in the pack – whoever is in charge of the national team
– when it comes to choosing a midfield partner for Scholes, Gerrard or Lampard
in a 4-4-2. Not because he is not as good; but because he is different – in a positive
but unappreciated way as managers of the Three Lions, after Carrick rose to
prominence, have been rather defensive-minded and conservative.
When the World Cup kicks off next year, Gerrard will be 34
and Lampard would be counting down his 35th year; and they could in
no way manage the frequent fixtures in group stage. Regardless of the
importance of their influence and experience, Roy Hodgson should really start
thinking about Carrick if he still hasn’t.
England has been relying on solid defence to go as deep as
they could in recent tournaments, often lost out ultimately in the Russian
roulette game --- penalty. When facing weaker teams, they run out of ideas to
break through the crowded defence. What Carrick can offer is greater portion of
possession and, if not the stagnant-breaking through balls, the passing range
to distort packed defence.
David Moyes perhaps could offer a tip or two when it comes
to building a 4-4-2 midfield around Carrick. Despite the fuss, Marouane
Fellaini is a more-than-decent partner for Carrick --- doing all the dirty
stuff as well as compensating for the physical presence, allowing the
Englishman time to use the ball wisely. The Gattuso-Pirlo partnership is
another good reference, seeing Pirlo flourished with the help of the Milan mad-man.
A good example to learn from |
It seems after all there are no suitable partners for
Carrick and, much to Hodgson’s regret, this is why he remains on the periphery
of the national team. After a much commanding performance against Poland,
Hodgson will stay a worried man to seek for solutions to utilise Carrick's
ability in Rio next year.
No comments:
Post a Comment